Shotokan Archives

Learning more Kata to live longer?

This year, like thousands of people, I’ve enjoyed watching National Geographic’s ‘Limitless’ with Chris Hemsworth. In this show Chris looks at his lifestyle and talks to a number of medical specialists about how he might be able to stay healthier for longer through a number of different approaches.

One of the elements the series touches upon is the importance of cognitive health. This is not simply the importance of reducing stress, or of endeavouring to have a happy outlook on life, but finding ways to increase and maintain neuro-plasticity to ensure that the brain continues to function at a high level throughout our lives and during aging.

(Note my PhD is not in any medical related discipline so please excuse any use of laymen’s terms.)

One activity that was mentioned as being studied as a potential route to maintaining good cognitive function was dancing, in particular the activity of learning and rehearsing new combinations of movements.

Dancing is not Kata, although the two have much in common. I would of course argue that if you do not know and cannot actively apply under pressure the movements of your kata against a resisting opponent then you might as well be dancing. That should not be a controversial view given its historical resonance. I also suspect (although I have no data to support this belief) that the understanding of kata movements and the ability to relate them to paired practice may enhance any cognitive benefits of their practice because of the greater connectivity between the movement and other memories of position combined with tactile and visual stimuli recall.

When I began Karate, with Shotokan as my foundation style, as part of my training process I learned as forms many as I could. I would normally learn a kata from a book and/or a Kanazawa video before doing it in class. In this manner I learned and was assessed on the majority of the 27 kata in the Shotokan canon.

Over time my training aims changed and as a Dan grade I have focused on training as few forms as possible. I can see the overlaps, variations, adaptations and redundancies between different forms and choose to maximise my training time and depth of understanding by working on a small number of kata. My emphasis is on drilling and rehearsing useful principles through minimal numbers of techniques rather than collecting more and more of ‘the same’ techniques and kata. I teach my Shotokan students what I consider to be a sensible slimmed down kata syllabus prior to their Dan gradings to ensure a depth of understanding and ability to apply in alive training. After their first Dan grade they are free to train as many kata as they want, I only ask them to undertake the discipline of learning and investigating one new kata per grading to ensure they understand the principles involved.

At present, in my DART Karate classes, I teach my own kata to condense further drills, lessons and technique coathangers on tight embusens that maximise the ability to rehearse a huge amount of material in as few movements as possible. DART students train my two kata, Initiative and Escape, and two widespread old and useful forms: Tekki Shodan and Seisan.

But am I going about this wrong? I’ve been focusing on condensing what we do in regular training for combative effectiveness. I have taught kata as a condensed way of rehearsing important principles and maintaining mobility rather than focusing on it as a longevity tool.

In my own personal practice, in my own dojo, I no longer use kata training as a visualisation tool. I neither focus on an intent for each plane of movement, nor do I shadow box with kata and swim freely through solo rehearsal jumping at ease from combination to combination depending on what I imagine. I can do these, but I don’t really need to as I am using my kata hands on (and watching my students do the same) for the majority of all my classes. When I move through a kata I feel as if I am gliding through a kaleidoscope of options. Without students or an audience, I simply use each kata to move and breathe, to maintain my mobility and balance while focusing on nothing more than the movement, my mind only focused on what I am doing.

But should I learn more kata to improve my neuro-plasticity?

Trawling through research published online it is possible to find studies such as ‘Effects of Dancing on Cognition in Healthy Older adults: a Systematic Review’ , ‘Dance for neuroplasticity: A descriptive systematic review’ , ‘Does dance counteract age-related cognitive and brain declines in middle-aged and older adults? A systematic review’ , and ‘Physical activity for cognitive health promotion: An overview of the underlying neurobiological mechanisms’ which suggest the activity probably will have benefits.

It increasingly seems the consensus that exercise (and in particular exercise that requires a range of movement, variability and cognitive engagement) is going to be beneficial for cognitive health. What is not so clear is whether the adaptation of continuously learning new routines is going to transfer greater benefits than the adaptation and variety of continuously applying existing routines on training partners or of recalling the stimuli of multiple applications while engaged in solo practice.

So the wheel turns once more to the question of how we train and how we use our kata. If your kata is a distinct entity from your kihon or kumite training then there is likely to be greater cognitive benefit in undertaking the challenge of learning and practicing greater numbers of kata, especially if the amount of time you spend responding to varied kumite stimuli decreases as you get older. If your kata already has the pliability and variability of being your primary kumite medium ‘built in’, then you are probably getting proportionally greater cognitive stimulation from rehearsing fewer forms. Regardless of how many kata you train, variability of stimuli and movement is good for neuro-plasticity so it would be good to have a kumite medium that you can engage in regardless of age (I have students aged 11 to 70 free sparring). In similar vein it makes sense that the more ‘open’ and variable the kumite is (striking plus grappling) the greater the cognitive benefits.

So, whichever route you want to take to better health, get out there and train!

Tomorrow

Tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow,

Creeps in this petty pace from day to day,

To the last syllable of recorded time…

It’s all too easy to put things off. Now, more than ever before, we are living in a world of distraction.

Engaging in a global world means that at any time, any person you know might be awake anywhere, and if your phone is online and messaging or email alerts are enabled, you can be distracted or woken at any time by either work or social messages. If that were not enough you probably have greater instant access to any book, periodical, paper, film or drama series you want at any time than anyone has had before you in history, and a more easily accessible range of physical diversions in terms of local clubs or facilities.

But often putting things off doesn’t simply delay them, it delays you.

When it comes to tasks or activities we undertake for health or self-improvement, the sooner we begin the odds are the more time we will have to enjoy it, benefit from it, or improve at it. Allowing ourselves to wait ‘until tomorrow’ is an avoidance strategy that has fewer rewards.

One of the biggest problems we all have is that we over-estimate what we need to do at any one time.

Going to a martial arts class is time consuming. To attend a one hour or ninety minute class you may have to invest two to three hours of your time including travel. That makes training only once or twice a week at a class very understandable for those with work and families to juggle, but training is not simply about attending class. You can get more from a class by training outside of it and that training does not necessarily require much time or flashy facilities.

Spiderman press ups alongside school homework.

I will the first to admit I probably spend too much time watching drama and documentaries. But at least half the time I spend doing that I will also be doing some form of push up, bridging, shrimping, planking, leg extensions, stretching, slow kicking on the spot, part or all of a kata or shadow boxing. I don’t have to break a sweat or be doing cardio to get in extra exercise that brings improvement. All I need is a small amount of ground space. I have a dojo, I use it a great deal, but I’m not going to sit still to watch or learn something if I feel I could benefit from more movement, I’m going to watch, listen and move.

That’s not possible for everyone, but even making a hot drink away from others in the kitchen can afford time or space for something. Every repetition counts.

What about training for your heart rate? Working sustained aerobic training does take up time and will build up a sweat, but you don’t really need to do that more than once a week and training for twenty minutes to an hour is fine. You could run, cycle, walk fast, hit a bag, run up and down stairs at a car park or block of flats, row or swim – the possibilities can be limited by your budget, but you should be able to do something each week. For intense cardio you just need to hit a maximum pace for thirty seconds to a minute a few times with rest breaks in between; you could be done in ten minutes, fifteen if you include a shower!

Look at your routine, look at your environment. What can you add at no financial or time cost? What might require a bit of time but no cost? Try them. See how you feel for having done them. Watch for and note results. Just the act of doing more in the same time may itself bring immediate ‘feel good’ rewards, but when you start to notice the cumulative effects, you’ll wonder why you ever waited for tomorrow.

Tomorrow may be for big aspirations, but those are achieved by small time-achievable things we can do today.

Start today.

the constant student

Last week I sat down and attempted to schedule my working hours to better accommodate the increased training time my changed weight training programme demands. It provided a refreshing opportunity to review how I allocate my time and brought me to a startling conclusion.

I invest more time each week studying to learn new useful information and practices than I do revising or repeating material I already ‘know’.

Like many people that took up martial arts at a young age, there are some things that I have practiced for decades. There are kata that I drill every week that I have known for many years. I may feel different when doing them, I may be more aware of what my body is doing, I might aesthetically look better, have better motor control and balance, but I am essentially ‘revising’ or refining my understanding of ‘old’ material. In similar vein, while there are some elements that I currently train in classes that I’ve introduced after a few months of trials in comparison with past approaches, there are other techniques and drills that have been a staple of my training for ten, twenty or thirty years.

Most of my physical training is spent revising and refining previously learned material.

Outside the dojo I’m constantly learning.

I will reread texts because as I learn and change there will be elements of other people’s work that will resonate differently with me. For example, from my own books, people with a narrow understanding of karate may sometimes be put off my application texts because the stances or kata are slightly different to their own. After gaining more experience they may see the parallels with older versions of the same kata as depicted in books or how other styles use the kata and realise that such details can be adjusted according to requirement. In similar vein some people may read one of my kata books and simply take a single application or two they like, whereas others might look beyond the techniques and instead adopt the flow system method of failure cascade that I’ve been using for over twenty years and apply that to their own sparring, with or without my actual applications. Others might take my training assessment criteria and apply them to their own repertoire to assess the efficacy of what they do as I did (with some tweaks) from Bill Burgar’s criteria.

The value of any book or information to a reader depends on the individual’s experience and understanding.

I’ve been teaching since 1989 and have formal teaching qualifications across a number of different disciplines, but I regularly look at how my own students teach, how other instructors teach and listen to podcasts on coaching to try and see how I can improve that element of my work.

I used to lecture on personal safety and self protection, but mainly now deliver information relevant to that vast subject through my syllabus and my sim days. It remains however the field where I still feel I have the most to learn even though I am currently writing a book on the topic. Over the decades the focus of my study has shifted and of course over the years I have been researching a number of my peers in the field have published their own books and the drive towards evidence-based crime prevention and policing has meant that the resources and information available to draw upon keeps growing. I do not anticipate ever reaching a point where I will feel I ‘know enough’ in this field.

I first qualified as a fitness instructor in 1995, the same year I was awarded my Shodan in Shotokan Karate. Sports Science is another continually developing field as we expand our knowledge of the human body and how we can enhance performance across multiple fields and recovery from injuries. I’m continuously trying to improve my knowledge in this field to see how I can enhance my personal training, my classes and the supportive information I give to my students in their syllabus.

I enjoy my current physical training and feel that in terms of what I do and what I teach I offer a useful holistic combination of skills to my students. My curiosity to learn more goes beyond that. As I depend on being injury free to work, I am very cautious as to how I cross train these days; I’m wary of being at the mercy of a student with less control than an experienced instructor, but I do seek to learn more through watching others (and then trialling with my own instructor team) and through judicious cross training.

As teaching karate is my main occupation, I have the luxury of the time to continually endeavour to further my knowledge. Every day is a school day and I love learning. The thought of limiting myself by not continually seeking to improve my understanding of something is anathema to me.

I am always going to be a student and that makes me happy.

Cross training

Cross training is something I strongly support. It’s also something I think I do every week, but what I consider to be cross-training may differ from what you think.

Last weekend I held a Shotokan Sandan grading. I was grading an instructor I consider to be one of ‘my’ Shotokan students (although he gained his other grades in another association) because he’s trained with me twice a week for almost 3 years (he also trains with another association each week too). To assist in the grading, I brought in two of my DART Dan grades to act as uke and two Shotokan Yondans from two different associations whom I know from their attendance at my seminars and courses.

The majority of the grading was focused on kata based HAOV related sparring with participants mainly using approaches I had taught them. The successful Sandan candidate also taught a kata-based lesson and we sparred using his approaches. When we looked at our solo kata performance however, there were definitely different flavours of Shotokan on display: no two kata were identical even though we traced very similar lineages.

I know where I’ve changed my Shotokan kata. My base template when I began training was Hirokazu Kanazawa’s kata as recorded in his 1980s videos. As time went on, I saw alternative versions in use in other groups and was able to see in books elements that had been adjusted or discarded. Over time I’ve mainly kept my ‘original’ template, but in some instances have made the conscious decision for practical reasons to tweak some elements back to Funakoshi’s recorded 1920s or 1930s versions. This means that you probably won’t find other associations that teach Shotokan kata exactly the way I teach them.

When I first began Karate, the mobility of my education and home life meant that while I would do sustained training, I would often be working with at least two different associations of the same Shotokan style throughout the year. Moving a few times meant that I might stay with one while switching another. It was immediately noticeable that everything was different wherever I went. The kata was the least changeable element, but even then, if you looked closely, each association did the kata slightly differently. What I was doing by going to more than one Shotokan association was cross training. Occasionally I would learn new material, but mainly I would experience a different perspective on the same thing: varied fundamentals combinations, distinct sparring work, alternative takes on stances and even differing ways of doing the same kata.

That is what cross training means to me. Gaining a different perspective.

As a kyu grade I learned from the different karate instructors in the various karate associations in which I concurrently trained, but I would also learn from instructors in other arts through books and magazines. I would also travel to seminars, training with Kung Fu instructors and Karate Instructors from other styles. I would often learn new material, but more importantly I gained a different perspective that enabled me to look differently at what I was already doing and gain a better understanding of it.

My over-arching purpose then was the same as now: to learn more and to have fun.

There have been times when I have been far more specific in my cross training. I studied Aikido on a regular basis for eight years with a view to improving my stand-up limb control, unbalancing and using angles of attack rather than strength to achieve my aims. I’d be a beginner now if I stepped into an Aikido class, but the perspectives that I gained from that training has been so integrated into my own practice that it’s all Karate to me now.

I am always cross training.

Going to another instructor’s club, going to a seminar, having a guest teach me and my students: these things are all cross training. Watching another instructor from a different background doing different things, whether in person or in video, I regard as cross training when I take elements of what I’ve seen and physically try it. It’s a rare week indeed when I am not working through something different from the direct influence of someone else, or that is inspired at a tangent from something that has cropped up while experimenting from cross training. I’ll do this in class, in mental rehearsal through movement and tactile imagination in my dojo, or through bag work. It may be months or even years since I had the original lesson in person or online; I work on things over long periods of time and I revisit lessons when current stimuli bring greater relevance. It ceases to be cross training when it is so ingrained in my practice and integrated into my approaches that it is part of my Karate.

For me the point of cross training is exposure to an alternative perspective to further my understanding. That can be my understanding of things I know, things that I only think I know, things that I know that I don’t know and things that I didn’t know existed. It can be with another instructor from the same ‘style’ but different background or current approaches, it can be from a separate system with a similar focus, or a discipline with a completely alternative emphasis. For me doing that is fun, and that alone is reason enough to do it.

Beyond the value of perspective and fun you may have particular goals. I chose to take up Aikido to develop a particular skillset and incorporated that into my own Karate. With far less direct coaching but for roughly the same number of years I have been drip-feeding myself cross training in two other disciplines with the express purpose of refining and expanding another part of my repertoire. That’s an ongoing process and I anticipate that that cross-training and integration project will last at least another decade. Over the last few decades, I’ve benefitted a great deal from numerous focused cross training dips into other approaches through seminars, videos and books. You do not have to stick with cross training in one thing only for years to gain insights, especially if it is closely related in form or focus to your own experience. Sometimes a single seminar or book can open the door to decades of study if you are observant.

How accurate and sustained your visual and tactile memory is will affect how much you may benefit from cross training and what form might best suit you. For those that need multiple repetitions to learn or understand or integrate an element, attending or watching regular classes may be best. For some this may mean having to attend a class every week, for others with an established relatable visual, physical or tactile memory set, observing a video or referencing a text book may serve the same purpose. Anything relatively close to my knowledge base I can see or experience once and have enough ‘memory’ to work on that for a long time (on my own or with partners) without further reference, like attending a seminar which uses the same movements as me but for a different purpose. With things that are on the fringes of my experience or completely outside my knowledge I’ll need to revisit the source again and again. That almost always means dedicated repetitions with a training partner and access to the source material (so regularly attending a class or training with a video or book with a good training partner).

For me cross training is when I am working on material from an external source or a different perspective to my current training.

I find it invaluable. Even when I make the decision not to attempt to trial what I have seen or experienced, even when I discard something after a trial rather than choosing to integrate it, I think the exposure to different approaches makes that choice to continue on my own path a more educated one.

I believe that cross training is a form of expanding your knowledge and ability that is accessible to everyone. It could be attending a seminar, having a guest instructor, visiting another class, working from concepts from a book or from an online video. It does not have to be ‘outside’ your own style: instructors vary enough within any system to give you valuable alternative perspectives. There is a wealth of material out there and the more you access it and cross train with it to your chosen purposes, the less easily will you be misled by lower quality choices.

Now go and cross train.

Circling but never landing

I don’t like flow drills.

Wait a moment, haven’t I written 5 books on Flow Drills? The (out of print) Heian Flow System and the four books of the Pinan Flow System?

Yes, I wrote those books. No, they don’t contain Flow Drills, they outline a Flow System.

What’s the difference?

I see a Flow Drill as a fixed sequence of moves, generally performed as a cycle of one person’s actions requiring a fixed response from a partner, sometimes involving the participants swapping roles on a fixed regular basis.

A Flow System by contrast is a training methodology designed to help users flow seamlessly between grappling and striking options in accordance to the dynamics of their sparring. While there may be static ‘fixed’ responses the first time a combination is introduced, extra variables are quickly added so that there really isn’t anything ‘set’ and the open-ended training is only limited by the experience, skill and imagination of the participants. Limiting yourself to only moves in the Heian / Pinan kata (which not all of my Shotokan students do) is hardly setting tight constraints.

So why don’t I like Flow Drills? Why am I so unreasonable?

Flow Drills is a blanket term. In principle I am in favour of any form of training that develops skill sets and attributes. I am in favour of any training exercise that is enjoyable (because people are more likely to show up to do it). I am also wary of anything that has a tendency to lull people into metronome-like behaviour and to become too accustomed to set responses to set stimuli. Like many instructors I am concerned that often people can fall into a distorted focus on becoming fast and proficient at the drill (the set sequence of movements) rather than proficient at using the techniques independently with a working understanding of how and when to use them and how to adapt them.

So like everything in the martial arts, whether flow drills are good or bad depends on their use in the overall structure of training, too much or too little of any training method has the potential for health or harm. If you continuously circle but never land then you are setting yourself up to crash. If a Flow Drill is fixed then it should probably be short. If points in one flow drill match up with points in another then students that know both should actively be encouraged to randomly switch; the more ‘overlaps’ and thus switch points the better because a Flow Drill will instead evolve into dynamic sparring or even alive sparring (if anything can be done). The more time in class we ‘lock’ students into fixed combinations the more we limit their ability to become skilful in recognising opportunity and proficient in adaptability and improvisation. Those traits must not be sacrificed for rigid training in the name of ‘skill development’.

The Kata teaching experiment

Last month I had the pleasure of teaching the Malta Karate Federation nine practical karate seminars over the course of six days. This was the fourth year that I had been visiting and so when the opportunity presented itself, I decided to test on a different group something I had found to be true on my own students.

On the Thursday night by request I introduced one of the core kata for my DART system students. I taught this in the manner I had originally learned kata in my original core style of Shotokan and how I had learned weapons kata in Aikido.

Teach a small sequence, repeat as necessary. Add another sequence, repeat… Once we’d done the sequence a few times I showed some ways to use that part of kata. Admittedly that wasn’t the way I was originally taught: I had to go out and make sense of the kata I was taught in my own time, but the point was to put form first.

A functional seminar and combined with a series of impact and reaction time pre-emption exercises I covered the first half of the form.

The next day I had a private class with two instructors and committed to finishing teaching the form. This time however I decided to take a different approach.

Here’s a paired drill; this is the threat/attack, this is a simple response. Where time permitted, I might also explain the underpinning fundamentals – the ‘why’ a particular movement is done. With each drill I’d occasionally illustrate the response without the attacker to illustrate the mechanics in a clearer fashion before returning to the paired drill.

After going through several of these drills with the instructors working them together at varying levels of intensity, I then got them to go through the already practised movements solo, one after the other. We thus completed the form.

Both instructors had begun their karate journeys learning kata in the same manner as me: form first, function later. Afterwards I asked which of the methods used on the two days made the learning process easier, form first or function first? In both I had essentially given both elements in the same session, but I wanted to know which made the learning process easier.

The unanimous answer was what I expected: function (drills) first, form later.

This was not a surprise. It’s easier to form positions if you have experience of using them, and applied physical practice is easier to remember than seemingly random movements pieced together.

So why teach the form first?

Most forms, even the fundamental ones taught at the start of a syllabus, are packed with movement and multiple possible applications. To cover every use of the form (assuming of course you are using the form) before teaching it as a memory exercise for solo practise at home is impractical. There is an argument that in a mixed ability group it is difficult to find time to train just one application drill for each sequence before you get to a stage where you want the students to be able to go through the entire form, but then so long as they have experience of part of a form they can work that while more experienced grades cover longer sequences, and as there is no physical contact in form work there is no harm in cycling other instructors or more experienced students through the counting/demonstration of the shorter sequences.

Over the years I’ve tried form first, form and function side by side, and function first, form later. I’ve found the last approach gives me the best results, whether I’m looking at developing skill sets in drills, developing impact power against pads, or in developing aesthetically pleasing form performance. If you’ve got the drills, why not try giving them the lesson before setting the homework?

Shotokan

innovate – educate – inspire